http://homelessnesslaw.org/2011/11/un-criminalization-laws-violate-human-rights/
I just wrote this
whole post then my internet shut down and it deleted it, Happy
Monday! First task for you is to read the
article above. Ok, done?
Good. In case you didn't really read it, it essentially addresses the
human rights violations that would occur if homelessness were made
criminal. The top 4 they bring forth are:
Control of behavior of people in public spaces. For example, the criminalization of panhandling, eating, and sleeping.
Discriminatory urban planning and zoning regulations. For example, there is an increasing trend of moving homeless and poor people to the outskirts of cities.
Excessive and arbitrary restrictions on qualifying for public benefits. The U.S. has implemented a severe public benefits screening process, with the stated goal of avoiding fraud.
The use of detention in punishing homeless and poor people. The criminal justice system has a disproportionate effect on certain communities.
The one that stands out to me the most is point #2, driving homeless people to the
outskirts of cities. New London is actually a
perfect example of why this is unrealistic and does not solve any problems for society. All of the services one could need are generally in the same
vicinity here. Shaw's Cove has
Adult Education, CT Works for workshops on
employment and resumes, Community Health Care has a
walk-in clinic, Oral Care Dental Group is a short trip up on Montauk Ave and they accept
ANY form of insurance (they also offered our guests vouchers for
free check ups), the VA has an
outpatient clinic at Shaw's Cove as well, and just up on Jay Street you will find
3 shelters. One serves
women, one serves
families and single adults, and one serves solely
single adults. One that is struggling can easily find
3 meals each day and then some in New London. How is all this relevant, you ask? Everything our guests need is within
walking distance and their needs are recognized and addressed by many
community partners. This is possible because we are in a city, if our shelter was in Uncasville we would be so far from practical services that our guests would likely not even bother going to a
clinic when they get sick or injured.
We do have a city
bus service, but we have a
limited amount of vouchers to hand out to our guests as it is and we reserve them mostly for
employment. Let's consider employment now. Most of our guests who have jobs are able to
walk to their jobs, even if that means leaving an
hour before the shift. Again, if we were in Uncasville or Niantic, less jobs would be available at entry level (which are the most
abundant as we have found), therefore obtaining employment in New London would be the most logical option, but there would be no way of
getting there. The bus you say, yes the bus. However, if we have 10 guests that are employed right now, say 8 are in
New London/Groton and 2 are in Norwich or at Mohegan Sun. It isn't really an issue to make sure those 2 people outside the New London/Groton area have bus
tickets, since it is so few, but if we were in a location 10-15 miles away and those same 8 people worked in New London we would have an extremely difficult time
funding transportation for all of them. So being in a city allows employment for more of our guests, and more
consistent employment at that. The more they are able to work, the more money they can put into their
Housing Savings Account (we require 30% from those with
income), and the easier it will be for them to find
housing...and the closer we are as a society to
eliminating homelessness.
Let's also look at our country's
spending; would it cost less to
incarcerate everyone without a home or to
support our local services and shelters so that the issue of homelessness can
eventually come to an end? How
long do you incarcerate someone for something that they can't
control? Once they've served the time, they will still be
homeless unless the criminal justice system would like to release everyone into
subsidized housing and
extended unemployment funds. In which case, why bother using any funding to incarcerate them in the first place? If we take steps to
END homelessness, none of this is even a question. According to National Public Radio and a source I have at the East Hartford Police Department (hey, Dad!),
incarceration for a single person is an average of $75,000 per year. First of all, that is
OUTRAGEOUS, but that includes
corrections and
programs that must be completed before release (the only useful programs they could provide as a result of being homeless would be the services offered at CT Works, however those
already exist). A single person living in New London can find a decent 1 bedroom apartment for about $750 a month, and a studio for around $600 a month, this is no more than
$9000 per year. I'll even go the next step and include cost of living; assume a single adult can feed themselves for $200 per month,
utilities cost about $100, if they really want
cable and internet service they're looking at another $150 a month. This still comes to around
$14,400significantly lower costs.
Jackie, do you realize that your whole post argued on the
SAME point as the article?
Yes. I do realize that, but since most of you reading this are
residents of New London County or at least Connecticut, I wanted to paint a very
realistic picture for you detailing the actual services that are offered in the community. You know how many people could be
housed at the same cost of
incarcerating ONE person? That would be
8 people. I know some of you get bored and aggravated by numbers, so I'll stop there instead of telling you that
as an alternative to incarcerating 60 people, we could house 500.
Think on that, and remember how
important it is to exercise your
passions. You can start by emailing me and coming in to
volunteer with us because we
need you. I'm not even going to sugar coat it and make it seem like we're doing
you a favor by offering you volunteer opportunities,
we need you, come help us.
Also, have a good
Monday.
-Jackie